| 2 | | * The `N:M` syntax is nice, but we could start also the `start` and `end` keywords like IncludeSourcePartialPlugin#Description. And/or we could use a keyword like `lines=N:M`. |
| 3 | | * For line numbering, I definitely think we should use a keyword: `lineno=True`. |
| | 2 | * The `N:M` syntax is nice, but we could also support the `start` and `end` keywords like IncludeSourcePartialPlugin#Description. And/or, I think we should consider using TracLinks syntax like `@200:27-30`, where `200` is the rev and `27-30` are the lines. We already support a peg revision like `@200`. |
| | 3 | * For line numbering, I definitely prefer a keyword: `lineno=True`. |
| | 4 | * Are you planning to continue developing IncludeSourcePartialPlugin? Or finalize that code and switch over to IncludeMacro development? I've granted you commit access to IncludeMacro. |
