Opened 14 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#8293 closed defect (worksforme)
FootNote generates duplicate numbers
Reported by: | Owned by: | Ryan J Ollos | |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Component: | FootNoteMacro |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Trac Release: | 0.12 |
Description
When the footnotes are listed with [[FootNote]], it numbers the list. So you get a listing like this:
1. 1. Text A and so on and so on. 2. 2. Text X
The first numeral is a numbered list number. The second number is the footnote number that is a link. It is the first number that is wrong.
In my case, the [[FootNote]] call is directly after a table. But as the separator line above the footnotes is drawn, I do not think that is causing any issues.
This is with the current version of the Macro.
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
Priority: | normal → high |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
Changed 14 years ago by
Attachment: | FootNoteMacro.png added |
---|
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
Looks like a CSS problem to me. The footnote list is generated as an ordered list (<ol>) in html, the list-style-type
is then set to none for each list item (<li>) in CSS. Inside the li there is the footnote number as a link (<a>) back to the footnote's origin. So CSS is used here explicitly avoid the display of both the list item number and the linked number.
So it would be interesting which browser/version the OP used when he experienced the problem. The Sitepoint CSS Reference reports buggy support in IE up to 8+.
Another Idea would be that the OP uses some custom CSS which unhides the li numbers.
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by
I just tried again, and the behavior is now correct. Since the report I have upgraded both Trac and the FootNote macro. So perhaps that did the trick. I have tried it on openSUSE 11.4 with:
- Google Chrome 11.0.696.28 beta
- Firefox 4.0
- Opera 11.01
They all work great.
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
Resolution: | → worksforme |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Thanks for the feedback!
I'm not able to reproduce. Would you kindly?:
Thanks!