#10143 closed defect (fixed)
KeyError: 'ticket-workflow'
| Reported by: | mohme | Owned by: | takanorig |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Component: | WorkflowEditorPlugin |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | unni | Trac Release: | 0.12 |
Description
How to Reproduce
While doing a GET operation on /admin/ticket/workfloweditor, Trac issued an internal error.
(please provide additional details here)
Request parameters:
{'cat_id': u'ticket', 'panel_id': u'workfloweditor', 'path_info': None}
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/536.11 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/20.0.1132.47 Safari/536.11
System Information
| Trac | 0.12.3 |
| Trac | 0.12.3 |
| Agilo | 0.9.6.2 |
| Babel | 0.9.5 |
| Docutils | 0.7 |
| FullBlog | 0.1.1-r9430 |
| Genshi | 0.6 |
| mod_wsgi | 2.5 (WSGIProcessGroup trac_https_wsgi WSGIApplicationGroup %{GLOBAL}) |
| Pygments | 1.4dev-20110115 |
| pysqlite | 2.4.1 |
| Python | 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jan 24 2010, 18:02:01) [GCC 4.3.2] |
| Python | 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jan 24 2010, 18:02:01) [GCC 4.3.2] |
| pytz | 2008c |
| pytz | 2008c |
| RPC | 1.1.2 |
| setuptools | 0.6c12 |
| setuptools | 0.6c12 |
| SQLite | 3.7.3 |
| Subversion | 1.7.3 (r1242825) |
| jQuery | 1.4.4 |
Enabled Plugins
| agilo | 0.9.6.2 |
| backlinks | N/A |
| backlinks-menu | N/A |
| BatchModify | 0.8.0-trac0.12 |
| SecureSession | 0.10dev-r1500 |
| TicketImport | 0.8 |
| TracAnnouncer | 0.12.1.dev |
| TracCaptcha | 0.2.2 |
| TracDiscussion | 0.8-r9877 |
| TracDownloads | 0.3 |
| TracFullBlogPlugin | 0.1.1-r9430 |
| TracMarkdownMacro | 0.11.1 |
| tracrpc.changeset | N/A |
| TracTags | 0.6 |
| TracTocMacro | 11.0.0.3 |
| TracWysiwyg | 0.12.0.3-r9676 |
| TracXMLRPC | 1.1.2 |
| WorkflowEditorPlugin | 1.0.4-r10056 |
Python Traceback
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Trac-0.12.3-py2.5.egg/trac/web/main.py", line 522, in _dispatch_request
dispatcher.dispatch(req)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Trac-0.12.3-py2.5.egg/trac/web/main.py", line 243, in dispatch
resp = chosen_handler.process_request(req)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Trac-0.12.3-py2.5.egg/trac/admin/web_ui.py", line 117, in process_request
path_info)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/WorkflowEditorPlugin-1.0.4_r10056-py2.5.egg/workfloweditor/workfloweditor_admin.py", line 57, in render_admin_panel
self._create_page_param(req, page_param)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/WorkflowEditorPlugin-1.0.4_r10056-py2.5.egg/workfloweditor/workfloweditor_admin.py", line 94, in _create_page_param
section = self.config._sections['ticket-workflow']
KeyError: 'ticket-workflow'
Attachments (0)
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 12 months ago by rjollos
- Component changed from SELECT A HACK to WorkflowEditorPlugin
- Owner set to takanorig
comment:2 Changed 11 months ago by rjollos
comment:3 Changed 9 months ago by rjollos
- Trac Release changed from 0.11 to 0.12
comment:4 Changed 8 months ago by rjollos
I've tried removing the ticket-workflow section, but then I'm just prompted to upgrade the database and the default workflow is restored. I can't see how ticket-workflow could be missing from trac.ini. If you have any hints, please let me know. I do have a small change to make which should prevent the error in the case that the section is missing from trac.ini. I'll commit that and close this ticket, but please follow-up if you can.
comment:5 Changed 8 months ago by rjollos
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
- Replaced access of the private field _sections in the Configuration object with proper access to the keyed item. The issue described in #10143 has not been reproduced, but this change should avoid a traceback if there is a case in which the ticket-workflow section is missing from trac.ini, because an empty Section object is constructed in the Configuration class under this scenario.
- Applied formatting changes to setup.py.
comment:6 Changed 7 weeks ago by rjollos
- Cc unni added
comment:7 Changed 4 weeks ago by rjollos
#11097 closed as a duplicate, with the recommendation to upgrade to 1.2.0-r13032.


I can't reproduce. Any idea of what conditions led to this?