Modify ↓
      
        Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#3187 closed defect (fixed)
There are still some leftovers from ClearSilver
| Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | Sebastian Marek | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | high | Component: | PeerReviewPlugin | 
| Severity: | major | Keywords: | bug | 
| Cc: | Trac Release: | 0.11 | 
Description (last modified by )
I'm using Trac 0.11rc2 and PeerReview 2.2-dev branch and I don't have ClearSilver installed. When I go to peerReviewSearch I get the following:
Trac detected an internal error: 
AssertionError: HDF dataset not available. Check your clearsilver installation
Python Traceback
Most recent call last: 
File "c:\progra~1\python25\lib\site-packages\trac-0.11rc2-py2.5.egg\trac\web\main.py", line 423, in _dispatch_request 
File "c:\progra~1\python25\lib\site-packages\trac-0.11rc2-py2.5.egg\trac\web\main.py", line 206, in dispatch 
File "c:\progra~1\python25\lib\site-packages\trac-0.11rc2-py2.5.egg\trac\web\api.py", line 297, in display
Code fragment:
def display(self, template, content_type='text/html', status=200):
	"""Render the response using the ClearSilver template given by the
	`template` parameter, which can be either the name of the template file,
	or an already parsed `neo_cs.CS` object.
	"""
	assert self.hdf, 'HDF dataset not available. Check your clearsilver installation'
	if self.args.has_key('hdfdump'):
		# FIXME: the administrator should probably be able to disable HDF
		#        dumps
		self.perm.require('TRAC_ADMIN')
		content_type = 'text/plain'
Local variables:
Name Value 
content_type 'text/html' 
self <Request "GET u'/peerReviewSearch'"> 
status 200 
template 'peerReviewSearch.cs' 
    Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 17 years ago by
| Status: | new → assigned | 
|---|
comment:2 Changed 17 years ago by
Replying to proofek:
Yeah, it's been spotted a little bit earlier already. Thanks for raising a ticket for us. A fix should be ready in next few days.
BTW. bear in mind 2.2dev is a development branch so you can expect some stuff be broken from time to time. I won't advise to use it in production env.
Seb
Thanks a lot! Are you going to merge it back to 0.11 branch, or I would still have to go with 2.2dev?
comment:3 Changed 17 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) | 
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → fixed | 
| Status: | assigned → closed | 
Fixed both in 2.1-toddler and 2.2-dev.
Note: See
        TracTickets for help on using
        tickets.
    



Yeah, it's been spotted a little bit earlier already. Thanks for raising a ticket for us. A fix should be ready in next few days.
BTW. bear in mind 2.2dev is a development branch so you can expect some stuff be broken from time to time. I won't advise to use it in production env.
Seb