Modify ↓
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#3187 closed defect (fixed)
There are still some leftovers from ClearSilver
Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | Sebastian Marek |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Component: | PeerReviewPlugin |
Severity: | major | Keywords: | bug |
Cc: | Trac Release: | 0.11 |
Description (last modified by )
I'm using Trac 0.11rc2 and PeerReview 2.2-dev branch and I don't have ClearSilver installed. When I go to peerReviewSearch I get the following:
Trac detected an internal error: AssertionError: HDF dataset not available. Check your clearsilver installation Python Traceback Most recent call last: File "c:\progra~1\python25\lib\site-packages\trac-0.11rc2-py2.5.egg\trac\web\main.py", line 423, in _dispatch_request File "c:\progra~1\python25\lib\site-packages\trac-0.11rc2-py2.5.egg\trac\web\main.py", line 206, in dispatch File "c:\progra~1\python25\lib\site-packages\trac-0.11rc2-py2.5.egg\trac\web\api.py", line 297, in display Code fragment: def display(self, template, content_type='text/html', status=200): """Render the response using the ClearSilver template given by the `template` parameter, which can be either the name of the template file, or an already parsed `neo_cs.CS` object. """ assert self.hdf, 'HDF dataset not available. Check your clearsilver installation' if self.args.has_key('hdfdump'): # FIXME: the administrator should probably be able to disable HDF # dumps self.perm.require('TRAC_ADMIN') content_type = 'text/plain' Local variables: Name Value content_type 'text/html' self <Request "GET u'/peerReviewSearch'"> status 200 template 'peerReviewSearch.cs'
Attachments (0)
Change History (3)
comment:1 follow-up: 2 Changed 17 years ago by
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:2 Changed 17 years ago by
Replying to proofek:
Yeah, it's been spotted a little bit earlier already. Thanks for raising a ticket for us. A fix should be ready in next few days.
BTW. bear in mind 2.2dev is a development branch so you can expect some stuff be broken from time to time. I won't advise to use it in production env.
Seb
Thanks a lot! Are you going to merge it back to 0.11 branch, or I would still have to go with 2.2dev?
comment:3 Changed 17 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | assigned → closed |
Fixed both in 2.1-toddler and 2.2-dev.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Yeah, it's been spotted a little bit earlier already. Thanks for raising a ticket for us. A fix should be ready in next few days.
BTW. bear in mind 2.2dev is a development branch so you can expect some stuff be broken from time to time. I won't advise to use it in production env.
Seb